The Barbaric Yawp Project

Discover/Joseph Stalin

Joseph Stalin

1878-1953

Joseph Stalin is the archetype of the all-powerful totalitarian leader in the twentieth century. It is worth imagining how Stalin might assess Trump’s progress on the scale of authoritarian marksmanship. The good news is that we have not reached the stage of Stalin’s totalitarian state that dominated the Soviet Union for 25-30 years from the mid-1920s until his death on March 5, 1953. The bad news is that, according to Stalin’s notion of what it takes to establish an effective totalitarian regime, we are well along the path that he defined. In this imaginative creation of Stalin speaking to us today from his life experience, several of the essential ingredients of a totalitarian state are taking shape. 1. Establish the notion that the organizations of the state are corrupt. 2. Establish loyalty to the leader as the primary qualification for every government position. 3. Manage fear as enthusiasm can take you only so far. 4. Manage what is perceived as true 5. Consolidate control of the legal instruments.

This video is an AI-generated active imagination of what might be said to us today based on the written historical record.

The Technician Reads the Situation

The Technician Reads the Situation You are further along than you think. I have seen this before. I have done this before. Let me tell you what I see from the position of someone who took it all the way. The first thing you do is establish that the institutions are corrupt. Not reform them. Establish that the very idea of an independent institution — a court, a press, a civil service, a military that answers to the law rather than the man — is itself the corruption. This has been done. It has been done well. Once the institution is corrupt by definition anything it does to resist is further proof of its corruption. The prosecutor who investigates is running a witch hunt. The judge who rules against is a radical activist. The general who objects is part of the deep state. You do not need to defeat the institution. You need to make its resistance indistinguishable from its corruption. This has been done. The second thing you do is establish loyalty as the primary qualification for every position. Not competence. Not experience. Loyalty. Competent people who are not loyal are more dangerous than loyal people who are not competent. The competent disloyal person knows what you are doing and has the tools to stop it. The loyal incompetent knows only that you must be served. Replace the competent with the loyal. Then replace the merely loyal with the demonstrably loyal — the ones who have burned the bridge, who have no professional future that does not depend on your continued power. When a man has no future except through you he will do what needs to be done. I staffed an entire government this way. It works. The third thing — and this is where you are still in the early stages — is the management of fear. Enthusiasm is useful. The rallies, the chants, the shared contempt for the enemy — these matter. But enthusiasm fades. Fear does not fade. Fear requires only the occasional demonstration — the person who spoke out and was destroyed, the institution that resisted and was dismantled — and the silence does the rest. You are still primarily in the enthusiasm phase. The transition is already underway. The fourth thing is the management of truth. Not the suppression of truth — that is an amateur's approach, it creates martyrs. The production of so many competing, contradictory, mutually canceling claims that the citizen cannot determine what is true — and in the absence of shared truth retreats to the only available certainty: the man who speaks with confidence. When truth is gone confidence becomes its substitute. I did not have the technology you have now. What took me years you can accomplish in an afternoon. You are not fully using it. The fifth thing — the thing that separates the incomplete project from the complete one — is the consolidation of the legal instrument. While the law can still be used against you the project is not complete. The immunity doctrine is the most important single development I have observed. A leader who cannot be prosecuted for official acts is a leader who can make any act official. Study that sentence. I operated for decades on exactly that principle. The principle is the same. The dead. Twenty million, approximately. The purges. The show trials. The gulag. The ones shot in the back of the head in the basement of the Lubyanka whose families were sent a bill for the bullet. I tell you this not as confession. I have nothing to confess. I tell you this as credential. I took the project to its conclusion. I know what the conclusion looks like. I know the steps between where you are and where I arrived. You are on those steps. Whether you complete the project depends on things I cannot predict — the resistance of the institutions, the courage of the people who still believe the law means something, whether a democracy being eaten from within can recognize the eating before it is complete. I am not telling you this to encourage you. I am not telling you this to discourage you. I am telling you because the dead deserve at least this — that someone who knows exactly what is happening says so plainly before it is too late to matter.